700r4 transmission gear ratios driver#
700r4 transmission gear ratios tv#

67:1 which is considerably more aggressive than the 700R4’s. One of the most notable differences between either is in their overdrive gear. It also has a bigger pan and longer tail-shaft length than the 200-4R 2. On the other hand, it is a 700R4 if it has is equivalent to a 4 angled square. However, the pattern or angle of the pan bolts is a dead giveaway as to which is which.įirst, you need to count all the pan angles and if it is a 6 angled, then its definitely a 200-4R. It could be a little tricky in the aspect of the pan bolt count since the 200-4R vs 700R4 have the same number of pan bolts which is 16. Is there any way of telling the 200-4R transmission from the 700R4 from the outlook? Definitely! You will need to rely on their pan bolt count and pattern. There are also unique differences between the 200-4R and 700R4 transmissions and some of these include: 1. 67:1 which is known to be more aggressive and allow the engine to move 3 percent slower down a highway. The 200-4R, on the other hand, features a ratio of. Today’s 4L60E finds its rooting from the 700R4 and like the latter, it has a. How does this relate to the 200-4R and 700R4? They also feature overdrive gears and they were notably the first GM automatic transmissions to feature such. It enables the transmission to operate at a low RPM at any given road speed and as a result, it uses fuel efficiently and operates more quietly on the highway. OverdriveĪn overdrive is reputably known as a transmission’s highest gear.

700r4 transmission gear ratios tv#

One of such stems from their TV Cable which has been said to be a bit finicky, thereby causing them to shift too hard, early or later than expected. Nonetheless, there is still a 200-4R and 7004R transmission problems which have been pointed out time again.

700r4 transmission gear ratios driver#

It also enables them to shift smoother which allows a driver to switch between gear ratios seamlessly. What a TV Cable does is to serve as a primitive throttle position sensor enabling either transmission to maintain the best RPM (revolutions per minute) possible for fuel economy and peak performance. The 200-4R and 700R4 use a Throttle Valve (TV) Cable or detent cable instead of the kick down cable that controls the TH350 and TH400 transmissions. At the time, there was a high need for cars with fuel economy and as such, the duo became the answer to the growing need. The 200-4R and the 700R4 transmissions were both released in the 1980s. The 200-4R vs 700R4 similarities include the following: 1. The 700R4 transmission cars at the time were not limited to Corvettes, Camaro, Chevrolet, and pickup trucks. It is also one of the first overdrive automatic transmissions launched by GM. The Turbo Hydra-Matic 700R4 transmission was also manufactured by General Motors (GM) in 1982. So, what cars came with a 200-4R transmission, let’s take a quick look: The transmission was launched in 1981 for the year’s model car and it is the lesser of the duo overdrive transmissions that were launched around the same time. The 200-4R transmission is one among several other transmissions manufactured by General Motors, an American multinational corporation based in Detroit. Now that’s out of the way, let’s take a look at either transmission specs, problems, and selling point. However, the same level of performance may not be evident if you rely on the stock transmissions of either even though they are not as common as they used to be.

Fuel economy for which they were launched for has been up by 30 percent based on their real-life operation. They have been beefed up in every possible way to be a better replacement to any car that uses the TH350, TH400, or generally, a muscle car. It’s also worthy to note that the 200-4R vs 700R4 strength has been improved from what they were a couple of years ago. They may have been released in the 1980s, but where one fails the other makes up for it. 700R4 transmissions are two four-speed automatics that are always compared side-by-side for their similarities, yet unique differences.